Model answer
Grey labels show the structure · highlighted = key idioms / connectives / set phrases
Opening — thesis statement数字时代,全球公民意识比以往任何时候都更需要培养。
Body 1 — 首先 the global village首先,互联网让世界成为“地球村”。气候变化、瘟疫流行、环境恶化,这些挑战已经超越国界。新冠疫情让我们清楚地看到:一个国家的危机能在几个月内蔓延全球,没有任何国境线能够挡住病毒。
Body 2 — 其次 information & bias其次,数字平台传播信息的同时,也容易制造偏见与对立。唯有具备全球视野的公民,才能辨别真伪、保持理性、尊重多元。
Body 3 — 最后 digital natives' responsibility最后,年轻一代作为“数字原住民”,更应肩负起责任,将科技转化为推动正义与可持续发展的力量。
Conclusion — 综上所述 synthesis综上所述,培养全球公民意识不是选择,而是数字时代每一位年轻人的必修课。
Translation
In the digital age, global citizenship awareness is more important than ever to cultivate. First, the internet has made the world a "global village". Climate change, pandemics, environmental degradation — these challenges have crossed national borders. The COVID-19 pandemic showed us clearly that one nation's crisis can spread globally within months, and no border can hold back a virus. Second, while digital platforms spread information, they also breed bias and confrontation. Only citizens with a global outlook can discern truth from falsehood, stay rational, and respect diversity. Finally, the younger generation as "digital natives" must shoulder the responsibility of channelling technology toward justice and sustainability. In summary, cultivating global citizenship awareness is not a choice but a required course for every young person in the digital age.
Answers could include
- Marker guidance (NESA exam-setting principle 2.9): a question on a controversial issue 'should be evaluated in terms of the presentation of the evidence rather than the position taken'. Students may argue EITHER that global citizenship awareness is more important than ever in the digital age OR that the digital age makes such awareness LESS practically meaningful. Reward the QUALITY of evidence and reasoning for the chosen position, NOT the position itself.
- PRO-thesis arguments (the digital age makes global citizenship more important):
- • The internet has made the world a 地球村 (global village) — climate change, pandemics, environmental degradation cross national borders.
- • Digital platforms spread information but also bias — global citizens must distinguish truth, stay rational, respect diversity.
- • Young people as 数字原住民 (digital natives) bear responsibility to channel technology toward justice and sustainability.
- COUNTER-thesis arguments (the digital age makes meaningful global citizenship harder):
- • Information overload + algorithmic filter bubbles narrow rather than broaden worldviews.
- • 'Slacktivism' — performative online gestures on global issues — can substitute for real action.
- • Compassion fatigue from constant exposure to global suffering erodes the empathy global citizenship depends on.
- • Cross-border problems require political-economic action, not individual awareness — making 'global citizenship' a rhetorical category rather than a practical lever.
- Either-stance essays should use canonical connectors (首先 / 其次 / 最后 / 综上所述; 不仅...而且) and substantiate each argument with concrete evidence. No fence-sitting — commit to one position and defend it (a brief concession-then-refutation inside the stance is fine and is NOT fence-sitting). No personal anecdotes about friends or family. No overused names (马云 / 乔布斯 / 比尔盖茨).
- Argumentative essay format: clear thesis statement, 3 distinct arguments, synthesising conclusion. Indicative Band 6 model response (pro-thesis) is shown below; a Band 6 counter-thesis essay following the same structure with comparable evidence quality is equally markable.